You Make The Call – Episode 15 Throw In Interference

Page Views: 339

Throw-in Interference & Post-Goal Ball Handling

This YMTC episode examines two game management dilemmas:

Interference with a throw-in near the end of a high-stakes varsity match.
A player aggressively grabbing the ball from the net after scoring in a heated U15 tournament match.

Both scenarios highlight how timing, rule variations between FIFA & NFHS, and game control impact refereeing decisionsYMTC #13.

Game Context:

High-level boys varsity match between top teams from ISL and WCAC.
The leading team is up 1-0 with only a couple of minutes left.
The losing team is awarded a throw-in on their defensive half—their last chance to push for an equalizer.
As the thrower releases the ball, an opponent runs by and swats it down mid-air.

Key Considerations:

The ball was never in play (had not fully left the thrower’s hands or broken the plane of the touchline).
Was it a caution or a send-off?
- A yellow card for unsporting behavior (USB) was issued since no prior warnings or similar misconduct had occurred.
- The assignor argued for a red card (DOGSO via a tactical, time-wasting intervention).
Restart Decision:
- The referee opted for a throw-in retake rather than a DFK.

Analysis & Rule Clarifications:

FIFA LOTG: A throw-in is only in play when it fully crosses the touchline.
NFHS (High School Rules): The ball is in play as soon as it is released.
If the ball was still in the thrower’s hands, the interference is a dead-ball misconduct—meaning the restart must remain a throw-in (NFHS rules would have required a turnover).
If the ball had already broken the plane, then the correct restart should have been a DFK for interfering with a restart.

Game Management Takeaways:

Announce time adjustments loudly to control dissent.
Visible time management is critical—stopping the clock clearly prevents disputes.
Set expectations early to deter late-game antics like this.

Game Context:

U15 national-level tournament match featuring two top-50 ranked teams (PA vs. NY).
PA leads 3-0, but NY mounts a late comeback and scores their second goal with minutes remaining.
NY accumulates three additional yellow cards for dissent and unsporting behavior.
After scoring, a NY player sprints into the goal, grabs the ball, and collides with the center referee at midfield while rushing for the restart.

Key Considerations:

Who controls the ball after a goal?
- The scoring team has no right to take the ball from the net.
- The leading team (PA) controls the restart—if they delay, it’s time-wasting, but NY cannot forcibly take the ball.
Was the collision with the referee misconduct?
- If intentional, it could warrant a yellow or red card.
- If incidental, the referee should de-escalate and reset control of the game.
What should the referee do?
- Issue a warning or caution for reckless behavior.
- Ensure PA retrieves the ball for the restart—preventing NY from engaging in further conflict.

Game Management Takeaways:

Grabbing the ball after a goal often leads to confrontation—it’s more about taunting and intimidation than saving time.
Referees must take control immediately to prevent unnecessary escalations.
Prioritize match control over mechanics—deal with the emotional aspects before recording the goal.

Throw-in interference:
- If the ball is still in the thrower’s hands, it’s dead-ball misconduct → Caution & retake the throw.
- If the ball is already in play, interference results in a DFK restart.
Post-goal ball retrieval:
- The scoring team should not take the ball—the leading team is responsible for the restart.
- Manage aggressive actions immediately to prevent escalation.
Timekeeping & Game Control:
- Be visible when stopping the clock to avoid late-game disputes.
- Game management matters more than strict rule application—keeping control is always the top priority.

This episode reinforces that awareness, confidence, and proactive management are crucial in handling high-intensity late-game moments.

Last Updated on March 12, 2025 by Frank